Winspear Resources Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Winspear Resources

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: the Chief who wrote (14441)	2/11/1999 12:27:00 PM
From: ddl	Read Replies (2) of 26850

Not bad for a first time post on WSP. But I must correct... The report does assume things as they all do, otherwise it would be hindsight, right? From what I can gather from my source it says... It does not assume tonnage of the whole fissure as that is an unknown as yet but it does make an extrapolated assumption with the information at hand and that includes the N/W pen plus under the lake to the next drill holes which intersect the dike (about 2km). I bit of long shot right now but then there were intercepts in the lake. But it does not, from what I gather include the other hits which are the north shore, south shore and east arm, and God forbid if they ever find the source! So the report is not a breakthrough in WSP unknowns, but it appears to be a prety damn good assessment made by a knowledgeable person with the information at hand and IMO clearly shows that as a spec play WSP has room to grow. - regards - denis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next