SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Ericsson overlook?
ERIC 9.700-0.5%9:32 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mika Kukkanen who wrote (2768)2/11/1999 3:44:00 PM
From: Raymond  Read Replies (4) of 5390
 
It's a lot of discussions here on SI and on Yahoo about who supports convergence and who's not.Vodaphone-Airtouch is for example mentioned as supporters of convergence.All companies wants convergence.All operators and manufacturers want's the radioparameters to be so it's easy to make multimodephones.But it doesn't meant that they supports QCOM's position.QCOM interest is to get as much licensing money as possible.That's the reason why QCOM says that they will not license out their IPR:s to WCDMA.One of the big differences is how you synchronize the basestations.In IS-95 GPS is used and all basestations will get the same clock.That is a disadvantage where GPS is not avalible..NTT Docomo is one of the main inventors of WCDMA.In Japan they have major parts of the mobile traffic inside in buildings and railwaystations.They need to synchronize without GPS.
So then they decided to go for asynchronous basestations.You use systemframenumbers and timingcells between the basestationcontrollers and the basestations to synchronize.This is a technical advancement but it will not give QCOM any money so they are very much against it.I think this is one of the big problems with QCOM:s position.They don't want any changes in their standard if it means that they will lose IPR-money.That position will only stall technical development.
/R
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext