International Precious Metals (IPMCF) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Randy Giese who wrote (2036)	2/6/1997 3:53:00 PM
From: ddl	of 35569

Good point Randy; I also feel that IPM has run some 500km tests of their own. Would you jepordize everything you put in on this project on a BD test without having checked things out beforehand? IPM has done and announced everything else the did, blow by blow, so why not let us know what they know about the 500kg tests? At least something along the lines of "The assays from these tests prove no degradation of recovery from previously announced..." I like Lee and will never forget his most famous quote..."It is my view that all of the 23 sq. km. geochmical anomaly at BRX can be converted into reserve status. Yes, that's what I said! Nothing of a technical nature at the moment would show me that this can not be achieved," Common Lee, let's hear for the bulk testing also! - Denis

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next