Since we have gone over this terrain before, I will be brief. You have insisted upon beating the Capone horse, included me in the charge of claiming that all who do not support removal are stupid, and had me as one of the baying hounds. You have insisted upon calling me a "type three Clinton hater", and all along have alternated between civility and a childish sarcasm. In the last couple of days, all pretense of civility disappeared. The very act of speculating that the "truth and justice" squad would "love to have libel laws like that here", to bankrupt the opposition, is slanderous. And you have the gall to complain because I characterized your point as "ludicrous"? Plus, you post irrelevant proof that Singapore does indeed do such things, when that is not the controversial point. Finally, are you actually so foolish as to not know that I was referring to Clinton's options in dealing with his lawsuit, not some poor guy in Singapore?
Since you applied the "type three" label to me, of course it is your diagnosis. Weisberg wasn't referring specifically to me, was he? You were not just passing something on FYI.
Have you been partying prematurely lately? |
