SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF)
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: ddl who wrote (2056)2/6/1997 5:04:00 PM
From: Randy Giese   of 35569
 
It would be hard to believe that they don't fully understand the issue of scalability after 20lbs. At this point, one would think that they have a predictable model which scales reliably.

If this model doesn't work at 1000lbs and they are forced to modify it then how can they reliably predict process reaction at full production scale? Isn't it logical that someone is going to ask how they can prove to them that no degradation will occur from 1000lb to production size?

Also, to have already announced ZERO degradation at 20lbs is very significant. What happens if they announce 0.20 at 1000lbs? Now, we have a possibility of non-linear degradation because everyone will point to the Feb. 4 release that says small and mid size testing revealed no degradation at all.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News