Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever? Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Clinton's Scandals: Is this corruption the worst ever?

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Buddy who wrote (11601)	2/12/1999 5:42:00 PM
From: Andrew Martin	Read Replies (1) of 13994

Judgement is circumstantial, not the law. That the charges were brought is what counts. Did he commit the crimes? Yes. The only issue in his defense was he was above the law, that the law did not apply to the president. As such he could commit the acts yet remain "not guilty" in the Democratic reasoning. There is no other explanation of the Clinton position. To factually and admittedly commit a crime yet not be held "guilty" of the crime means the standard of the law is not applied to the criminal. An abortion of law. What "a news show with a group of prosecutors" has to do with filing charges I do not know since it is a district attorney/(judiciary committee) that makes the decision after reviewing investigative material. By your logic the leader is held to a lower criminal standard than the 250 mil. people Below him who pay his salary. Having faced the charges Clinton and his defenders, et. al., continued to repudiate the Value of the law et. al. by insisting responsibility to the law does not extend to the president.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next