Darrell Youngblood
From: D PARKER
Saturday, Feb 13 1999 6:36PM EST
-Preview-
Darrell, the answer to the second question first: no, there "is" (by his definition) no
connection to the Clinton administration. I will also add: neither has there been any
direct connection in the past. That begs the question of "indirect connection". I will let
you decide that for yourself.
Clinton is the chief law enforcer of the land, as every President has been while in office.
He must be held accountable for his actions while in office. This is obviously is another
platitude, however, consider the ramifications of this: How far down the chain of
command do we have to go to find someone responsible (ie. a suitable scapegoat)?
I lay the responsibility of the deaths of my family squarely at the feet of this
administration.
Why? Because, the Clintonites continue spewing the poison that personal responsibility
for ones actions do not matter.
A long stretch you say? If you believe that his lying under oath will not affect and effect
you personally, stop reading here and go back to the rest of the lemming herd.
The key here is personal responsibility When someone is not held accountable to
and for their personal actions, there is no deterrent to future actions. The court system
has been sowing these seeds for years and we are, as a nation, reaping the whirlwind
because of it. By using "revolving door justice" the court system sends perpetrators
back into the citizenry to continue their victimizing of innocent people.
Personal example: The man that killed my mother was previously arrested several times
for driving drunk. He caused several "accidents" and many dollars in damages. The
court turned him loose each time with a slap on the wrist and an admonition to not do it
again, which he agreed to. That led to the mangled, mutilated body of my mother
spread across several hundred feet of highway after he crossed two lanes of traffic, a
greenbelt and into the oncoming path of my mothers car. His punishment? loss of
license for a while. He is still driving today.
example in the news today: drug partners gone bad. Dealer tried to kill him, he
survived bullet wound to scalp. Dealer went to jail, was released on technicality. Man
was gunned down in car several days later, step-son was in car also. Man was picked
up by police, turned loose. His attorney gave him id of boy. Boy and mother found
dead in home, shot in back...
Clinton is an example, the "homeless" man that broke down my front door is an
example. Therein you have the gamut of this problem.
Clinton, whether he accepts it or not, has the responsibility of seeing that laws are
upheld and justice is at least observed in the legal system. This is water so far over the
dam that it is out of sight.
Does that give you enough to answer your first question?????
Citizen Dave |
