SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Let's Talk About Our Feelings!!!

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Grainne who wrote (30761)2/13/1999 11:07:00 PM
From: Achilles  Read Replies (3) of 108807
 
I'm glad to see that so many are having fun with the tinky winky thing. Falwell's gaff is, I think, socially interesting. The creators of these characters seem to have gone out of their way to create beings that are asexual--neither explicitly male or female. This effort at neutrality, when juxtaposed with a male voice coming from the costume, led Falwell (or his 'researchers') to interpret the phenomenon as disguised homosexuality and then to imagine that there was some conspiracy to import homosexual role-models into the home. I find it interesting that fear of one unknown (tinky winky) results in it being interpreted as a form of that another unknown, homosexuality, which Falwell cannot come to grip with.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext