Jach, there are folks on most threads that, like you, take contrary positions to the majority and are flamed quite frequently. What makes them different from you, however, is that their posts have some value to them. From what I can see so far, yours have none. In fact, yours do not even follow any logical pattern. For example, Lin wrote a post showing the top 10 holdings of a very successful mutual fund manager as shown below:
<<
Top 10 Holdings
Company Percentage
of Portfolio
Cisco Systems 7.3%
Dell Computer 7.2
Charles Schwab 6.3
Home Depot 5.5
Intel 4.9
Microsoft 4.9
Applied Materials 4.7
Mirage Resorts 4.4
Kansas City Southern 4.1
Progressive 3.9
Total 53.2
>>
In response you wrote:<<<to jach, the most influential network analyst on SI>
sure, AMZN is first to go, down almost 100% from its high. CSCO will follow.
>>
What in the world does AMZN have to do with this post? Nothing. It's not even mentioned on the list. Perhaps if you had pointed out DELL your post might have had some meaning to it. I can only assume you, as proven with subsequent posts, were lashing out at CSCO in any way you could.
Go ahead and respond to this post if you must but do not expect a response from me. It is obvious you simply crave attention and any response to you would just feed that hunger. Jeff
|
