SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Rambus (RMBS) - Eagle or Penguin
RMBS 87.70-3.8%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: unclewest who wrote (15612)2/16/1999 5:52:00 AM
From: Bernard Super  Read Replies (1) of 93625
 
Re: the eetimes story:

In my report, Part II, on the Rambus Annual Meeting, Post #14805, Point #11 - I mentioned Tate's citing embedded DRAM as a potential competitive threat. You might therefore say 'bad', but see the comment below.

Apart from the obvious fact that every technology we know of today will eventually be either obsolete, or relegated to some large or small niche - my opinion is that it will be at least five years before embedded DRAM significantly impacts the need for Rambus' chip-to-chip interface technology.

By analogy - increased speed, density and size of RAM has not obsoleted hard disk drives (yet!).My current desktop RAM is 128 Mbyte, and hard drive 6.4 Gbyte. Just a few years ago I had a snazzy new computer that had 2 Mbyte of RAM and a 20 Mbyte disk drive.

With regard to ARMHY - it's products are usually used as the core microprocessor along with memory and sometimes other components in ASICs (Application Specific Integrated Circuits). ARMHY's basic business challenge, IMO, is to evolve rapidly both technologically and business-wise, so as to improve its competitive position.

So with regard to ARMHY, I'd say 'neutral'.

Regards - Bernard
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext