Yogen Fruz IT'S ALIVE, IT'S ALIVE Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Yogen Fruz IT'S ALIVE, IT'S ALIVE

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Hank Stamper who wrote (1165)	2/16/1999 7:10:00 PM
From: yogi bare	Read Replies (2) of 2453

I also received the Q1 report in the mail. Something I am confused about though..... Sales jumped from $5,436K to $18,615K or about a 242% increase Cost of goods sold went from $3,557 to $10,593K an increase of 192% Does it not make sense that the cost of goods sold (this should include the butterfat component) should have increased at a higher rate than sales to have the negative impact they claim. According to the above the margins look better? What I notice is a bigger increase in the selling and administrative expenses. In 1997 it only accounted for 32% of sales. In 1998 it accounts for 48%. Total selling and admin expenses increased over 400% from 1997!!! This expense seems to have dragged down earnings, perhaps the butterfat issue is a cover-up. Just my thoughts.... anyone??? Yogi....

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next