SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Kenneth R. Moss who wrote (7358)2/16/1999 7:26:00 PM
From: Sonny  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
If, say, about 100 people paying 100 buckaroos each write to SI webmistress about keeping the thread in proper conformance to its title, to drive out a fanatic, I think that voice may have a chance to be heard and may result into bringing this thread back to some normalcy. Never ending bombardment of erroneous postings about Iomega and its products should be stopped from this thread at least, imho. I'm not sure if anybody prevents such posters to start their (n-th) thread about shorting IOM and posting there, isn't it? I've started feeling recently that some of these characters must be paid a full time salary by some hedge-funds :-) etc. to do this work, otherwise, who will have the energy or motivation left to do such work day-in and day-out (in their right minds), given the fact that un-employment is so low right now, and this is not a spiritual kinda work :-) !

cheers to the cooler heads and regards to longs, what a solid support IOM is depicting at these levels, no matter what the NAZDAQ does recently, isn't it?

-/Sonny.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext