Taz,
In case you missed this:
Message 7856338
I am here to share opinions, have fun, speculate, and engage in some thought provoking discussion when available. I do agree that the Stockwatch thread on Winspear is for the most part, well mannered and civil. I don't mind being questiioned or corrected.....that is all to the good as far as trying to arrive at specifics or to clarify certain points. As for extremely wild hype....I assume you are refering to my previous posts as to the tonnage potential of the Snap Lake cone sheet?.....well, I happen to believe at this time that IF about 80 holes were drilled on say 400 meter centres (one drill hole for each of the grid squares around Snap Lake as in the diagram in the last NR), we would be at a drill indicated (as distinct from drill proven) level of 80-100 million tonnes.
However, all of us who have read the news releases know that for practical purposes related to potential extraction rates, part of the drill program will be directed towards establishing a drill proven resource on much tighter drill centres with the aim of facilitating a feasibility study of some kind. Surely you must find the geology and petrology, and implications thereof, of Snap Lake to be of considerable interest in itself? Regarding Aber, I look forward to any comments you may have with respect to my last post which included Aber(see above link).
regards,
teevee |
