SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Ken Pomaranski who wrote (7406)2/17/1999 1:11:00 PM
From: D.J.Smyth  Read Replies (1) of 10072
 
Ken, Rocky, or whoever you are <<See, you guys want it both ways here... If it's sold as an option,
penetration is lower but margins are higher. If it's sold as standard, Iomega is squeezed by having to meet the floppy price point. >>

Iomega has never been "squeezed", as you say, by any OEM to meet the floppy price point. Zip costs are constant; no OEM would expect Iomega to drop the price on Zip to the point where the inclusion price is less than the fixxed cost price. Such a scenario would bring disaster for both the OEM's inclusion and Iomega. The OEMs are aware that Iomega must also make a living. If an OEM includes zip as standard throughout, then the cost of that box is configured to include the zip as standard.

Your statement is implying that Iomega MUST include the zip as standard in EVERY box in order to be successful - nothing is further from the truth. Iomega gets to 36 million zips by year end you won't see a $6 stock - the mathematics simply don't work that way. The current price has more to do with emotional despair than anything going on at Iomega and the box makers. And you are adept at playing against people's fears/emotions.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext