SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Paracelsian Inc (PRLN)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Judy Muldawer who wrote (1568)2/8/1997 12:14:00 PM
From: John H. Farro   of 4342
 
Judy, Larry is telling the truth in that Peter's appearance here is spillover from a flame war between Larry and Peter on the HCCA thread. Peter has never demonstrated an interest in PRLN's stock before the flamewar and I doubt he has any shares to dump. Actually, I probably shouldn't characterize what's going on in the HCCA thread as a flame war because that implies that both sides are being nasty flaming jerks. Actually, Larry and a few others have raised intelligent questions concerning the fundamentals of the company. While the official HCCA investor relations person seems to be level headed in answering questions about the company, Peter and Craig have gone into emotional flame mode against anyone who calls into question the fundamentals of HCCA. I wouldn't be too alarmed about Peter's assessment of PRLN. He has not been following the company as closely or as long as any of us have. Nothing he has said so far demonstrates to me that he has any great knowledge of what is going on here.

Can Peter's negative posts about PRLN adversely effect the stock price? I doubt it. If Paul can't single-handedly drive the price up to $5 with his positive assessment, Pete can't drive it down to $1 with his negative assessment.

Robin M.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext