SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 45.51+10.7%Jan 9 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Fred Fahmy who wrote (10626)2/8/1997 1:42:00 PM
From: Robert Florin   of 186894
 
On what do you base your conclusion that Cyrix has a distinct possibility of going out of business in 2-3 years? Is it your analysis of the b/s, p&l?

To the extent that Cyrix has the possibility of going out of business in 2-3 years, so did Intel in 1980 when AMD was producing lots of microprocessors and Intel barely had an 8008 and 8088/8086 market. The 6504 by AMD (with, I believe, INTC as a second source) had a much bigger market in the Apple II plus then the non-existent market for the x86 architecture. I don't have historical charts that go back that far but my guess is that the equivalent Intel price would have been $1 or $2 per share.

Going forward I would much rather own a stock with the appreciation potential of a 1980 Intel, than the appreciation potential of a 1997 Intel. If Intel went up 80 times more in value to duplicate its feat of the last 17 years it would be at market capitalization of 80 * 150 * 880mm = 10,500,000,000,000. That is more than the GNP.

On the other hand cyrix going up 80 in value would mean:
80 * 25 * 20mm = 40,000,000,000. That is less than 1/3 of Intel's current capitalization.

But in 18 years maybe INTC value will be greater than the GNP. :-)
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext