SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Dell Technologies Inc.
DELL 129.98-6.2%Dec 12 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: powershred who wrote (102652)2/18/1999 1:16:00 PM
From: John Koligman  Read Replies (1) of 176387
 
The average user will see no difference. Without software measuring the differences, few people would have any idea what is inside the box. These days, most folks notice by 'how fast' their applications open. AMD uses a different graphics scheme called 3DNOW, Intel uses MMX and now has an additional 70 instructions in their PIII chip. Both manufacturers offer low end chips that are more than adequate for anything the average user will do. Game players will tend to go for top power, and possibly graphics folks. For internet access, I don't think 350mhz or 450mhz matters all that much. I've posted on the Intel thread in the past asking for articles/data on qualitative differences between AMD and Intel chips, never got a response. Lots of hype and name calling between the Intel and AMD threaders. Fact is, AMD has done consumers a service by forcing down chip prices. I doubt you would be seeing a Celeron line without them.

John

PS - If AMD processors were riddled with quality problems you would not see CPQ, HWP, and IBM using them. Gateway has also stated they will be selling AMD equipped boxes, initially overseas...
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext