SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Kazakhstan minerals KMC.U -TSE

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jack hampton who wrote (86)2/19/1999 10:47:00 PM
From: jack hampton  Read Replies (1) of 112
 
WASHINGTON D.C--World Wide Minerals Ltd. announced today that it had filed an amended Complaint in its legal action in the US District Court for the
District of Columbia. The Complaint, originally filed in the Washington D.C. Federal Court in May 1998, named as defendants the Republic of Kazakhstan and its
uranium production and marketing agent, Kazatomprom. Now World Wide also has named Nukem, Inc. of Stamford Connecticut as an additional defendant.
Nukem, a uranium broker, is a subsidiary of the Ge rman energy conglomerate, RWE Energie AG.

The lawsuit alleges that the defendants defrauded World Wide and its affiliates in connection with a US$23 million investment made during 1996 and 1997 involving
the substantial reconstruction and redevelopment of uranium mining and processing facilities
in Kazakhstan, a former Soviet republic in Central Asia. After inducing World Wide to make the investment, the Republic of Kazakhstan refused to issue agreed
permits for the export of uranium concentrates produced by World Wide's affiliate and then, th

e Complaint alleges, unilaterally and unlawfully terminated World Wide's investment agreement.

World Wide alleges that Kazakhstan and Kazatomprom conspired together and with Nukem to grant to Nukem uranium marketing rights which had been
contractually granted to World Wide, in breach of the investment agreement. In addition to its claim for reimb ursement of its US$23 million investment, the lawsuit
also claims US$200 million in damages for lost profits.

In the amended Complaint, World Wide also charges the defendants with fraud and racketeering under the US Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organization
(RICO) Act. The RICO claim, if substantiated, would permit the Court to award treble damages and c osts to World Wide.

World Wide is in the process of restructuring its other uranium and gold related business activities in order to concentrate on the Kazakhstan investment recovery
and to position itself to benefit from recovery in commodity prices and improving investmen t sentiment towards the metals and minerals sector. As part of this
process, World Wide has secured the necessary working capital financing for its Kazakhstan-related business activities.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext