Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 160.10

+0.3%

11:16 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Ruffian who wrote (23120)	2/20/1999 7:36:00 AM
From: JGoren	Read Replies (3) of 152472

Obviously, Ericy didn't think it's claims that clear. In order to obtain an preliminary injunction, Ericy would have had to prove that it probably would win the case. Looking back, Ericy has dropped several claims and several of its remaining claims may depend on extensions of its patents that were granted only a couple of months ago. Remember, if we Qcom shareholders are correct, Ericy's principal goal has been to delay Qcom and cdmaOne; losing a preliminary injunction battle would not have helped in the overall Ericy strategy of muddying the waters. Ericy would have had to show too much of its hand early. If I can take a day off, I may drive over to Marshall Monday in order to watch the Markman hearing. If I do, I will report to you guys who will be having fun in San Diego.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next