Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

QCOM 163.32

+2.3%

Nov 21 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: JGoren who wrote (23151)	2/20/1999 5:55:00 PM
From: Dave	Read Replies (1) of 152472

JGoren: Re-issue, extension, whatever you want to call it (presumably Ericy had some idea this might occur)--are factors that would lead Ericy not to make a preliminary injunction attempt I don't work for Ericsson, either directly or indirectly. To be honest, I do not know why they wouldn't file for an injunction. It is one of the steps in a patent infringement suit. With regards to the "Re-issue" or "Re-exam" of patents, it is not done often, but it is done within the office. I believe it is more of a "non-effect" and, technically, after a "Re-issue" or "Re-exam", it should be more difficult to invalidate that patent in court, if the proceedings were done correctly within the PTO. dave

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next