Well, 25 posts while I was away is certainly nice to see. I can remember the days when the good Dr. was the lone poster for weeks on end.
To answer a few of the questions;
1) The company does not have an outside IR, so the answers you are getting are quite indeed directly from the officers of the company. DCHTinvest@aol.com should be used for any and all detailed questions provided you want an accurate response.
2) No one should doubt that I have talked directly to Go2Net's general Counsel, nor that of Yahoo. I have spoken to both and they BOTH have informed me how to properly request and RECEIVE information about an anonymous poster. If anyone thinks a subpeona is that hard to get, I suggest you call your lawyer and ask. I would like to see Sid retract his , "Mr. Oshinsky is lying again" remark after he makes the call.
3) I now understand why Sid emails the company and they receive a block on the return email. Apparently Sid may be telling the truth when he says he has been threatened before which would explain why he uses an email blocker when he sends letters to companies suggesting they fire their outside consultants. At first I thought it was just the device of a snake to do something like that; but Sid's explanation makes sense.
4) There is considerable info on Antaeus and their parent company which was prepared by Kathy McKnight-McConnel, which I received via email from her over the weekend, which I imagine was that which a prior poster was referencing. I didn't read it in depth but I did skim it. If you can't find it then email her directly and ask for it, Kknightmcc@aol.com.
5) I don't think it is correct that Antaeus and DCH are connected in any way therefore the "intra" company designation would be inaccurate.
6) I hope Sid will retract his assurances to you all that there are only two possibilities to account for the income statement inaccuracies once they are corrected and posted; which they will be. There is a reason why they say, "unaudited".
7) I am glad that the people running the show at DCH are not accountants and are instead focussed on what they should be doing which is building their business.
Unfortunatley, I can not go into detail on any matter concerning their finances, but to suggest that DCH is going to be out of business by such and such a date is preposterous on its face. They are shipping product and that's what keeps companies in business; although i am sure that many of the companies that Sid has been involved in have used other methods, you aren't going to find that here. The majority of the early investors in DCH Technology are the officers themselves and their family and friends.
The concern for the shareholders in this case is synonymous with concern with members of their own family. DCH cares about its investors and has evidenced that by responding to the questions asked, (when asked properly), and posting them on their website. other's less suspicious would consider that a very nice thing for a company to do; show me a dozen other's that care enough to do that.
In all, the conversation here has improved dramatically, although Sid still feels the need to take shots at me every third paragraph or so, but unlike Sid, I am confident that the egg that will soon enough be on his face will be enough to make him disappear; not threats, not getting his name and address via subpeona, and not by belittling him. In fact, it can be said that if it weren't for Sid, this thread may still be dead.
That wasn't a thank you Sid.
As a paid consultant to DCH technology, my disclaimer can be found at the end of this report; stockhouse.com |
