SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Cisco Systems, Inc. (CSCO)
CSCO 76.39+0.5%10:39 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Frank A. Coluccio who wrote (22927)2/22/1999 12:09:00 AM
From: Joe S Pack  Read Replies (1) of 77400
 
Frank,
This my view on "intelligence at the edge" philosophy.
This view is based on the analogy that I draw from computer
evolution. In the beginning there was a mainframe and world was
concentrated at the center. Some smart(?) guy at the leading mainframe
vendor in 60's theorized that computer will be very expensive for
ordinary folks and only evolutionary path should be followed is to enlarge machines and attach hundreds of remote terminals and then
rent the terminals. What they failed to see was how technology will evolve and make that notion ridiculus after 25 years. The computer took an
evolutionary path from mainframe to minis to pc to handhelds. Of course there are business situations where main frame make much sense.
But even in those environment the configurations are drastically different than the original model. So what happened within the past 25 years on computer front is a history replete with technology than status quo and so called business smarts.
I envision the same evolutionary path on the communications infrastructure. So, more and more intelligence will migrate towards
the edge. This evolution will be dictated not only by the technology
in communication hardware/software but also to some extent by
a lot intelligent and quality sensitive applications at the edge.
For example if one wants a certain level of QoS for a particular application,
requesting a certain route and QoS and if needed doing own scheduling at the edge may be much easier than having centralized schedular at
the core.
From business perspective such an evolutionary path will obviously put a lot of pressure on high-margin core players like CSCO. One open
question is, can there be a single dominant player at all levels of hierarchy? Or Can there be a king, like Microsoft is for computers,
at the edge of the network? Unlike in computer sphere where there was and still is no standard, these are some of the tough questions in an industry where standards still dominate.
-Nat
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext