Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Johnathan C. Doe who wrote (34778)	2/22/1999 12:18:00 AM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (1) of 67261

Actually, I responded directly to questions you raised about why the Republicans had not used her affidavit. You didn't like my response, so you are now claiming that I "missed the point". Of course, the article also addressed her rationale for having not gone to the authorities at the time, and for lying earlier. It is certainly plausible that an ambitious young woman in a small southern state should be averse to making charges against an up and coming politician, lest she should become the victim of retaliation. Subsequently, she might well be averse to publicizing a shameful incident. Many rape victims feel as if it is their own fault, because they let the guy in the room, or didn't fight the guy off more aggressively. In any event, she also had a sense that she would be subject to demeaning counter- claims were she to come forward. It was after it seemed futile to try to hide it any longer, and in order to discourage some of the more conjectural stroies, that she came forward. could she be lying? Perhaps. Is it obvious that she is lying? By no means.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next