Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Paul Engel who wrote (50495)	2/22/1999 7:42:00 PM
From: Cirruslvr	Read Replies (7) of 1573215

Paul - RE: 2.4 Volt I was wondering how you would react to the chip being officially released and this - amd.com. Now we know. I guess you can't handle the fact that Intel's yet unreleased processor is being shown to be slower than the K6-III. Slower, Paul. Intel's chip is slower. The customer will see these benchmarks. All customers may not change their mind, but a good proportion of them will, and they will purchase K6-III systems, whenever they become widely available. Joe Consumer doesn't care about how much voltage is required to run the K6-3 in their PC. As Jim said, this is better for AMD because now they will probably get higher yields. As far as the notebook version of the K6-3, Jim says it exists. It will be here next Q. AMD will be able to sell them. My guess is they will run at 2.0 volts, or with about 10% more voltage than required to run the notebook K6-2 chip. Again, it was interesting to see your reaction to all the buzz today, including this amd.com. The K6-III is faster than the PIII w/only 512K L3 cache. Intel is slower.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next