SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Osicom(FIBR)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CMS27 who wrote (9270)2/22/1999 10:06:00 PM
From: Eddy Blinker  Read Replies (3) of 10479
 
Osicom has a sales party!

Scott,

<Business is business and that the way it works. Osicom has an investor relations team and thier goal is to put a favorable light on the company. Did they not announce the Gigamux prior to it ever having sold?>

Well.... I am actually pleased with your response because you could follow up the squeezed out acknowledgment that you know well how to differentiate news for its newsworthiness and engineered news in order not only to help a sales force in trouble by providing tangible material originating directly from the barn in Murray Hills.

Well if business is business and that's all fair play as you state, then I would like your opinion about my contention all along, that last years damaging news originating in the UK and it's further advancement by Barons was equally "business" and that how it works.

<If you really doubt Lucents ability to execute on this announcement or the strength that their size and leadership position gives them at the sales table, then you are the "salesman in trouble">

I am not in trouble because I know how monopolists work. They rather would give their goods away to get the competitor off their turf. And if everything else fails they buy him out.In the end they always get their man.

Well I guess OSICOM is in good shape. This Lucent news release showed me OSICOM has a sales party.

ED

Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext