SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Jim McMannis who wrote (50604)2/23/1999 1:16:00 AM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1573458
 
<Still, the fair person that I am, the Pentium III does have MHz going for it and volume.>

While we're being fair, let me take my turn and say that the K6-3 (oh, my bad, the K6-III) is perhaps AMD's first serious contender for the business segment of the market. The Super7 platform is, more or less, getting better in reliability every month. And now AMD has a chip which runs office applications just as fast as Intel's latest-n-greatest. Like Jim said before, AMD can neatly position the K6-III somewhere in-between the Pentium III and the Celeron. If only AMD can make enough of those K6-III chips, we can finally see those chips start to dot cubicle-land.

Yet the K6-III does present a quandary for the guys in charge at AMD. It's pretty much a given that AMD is capacity-constrained right now, so we have to ask how much K6-2 production must be sacrificed for K6-3 production. I would guess that AMD will try and leave the sub-$1000 retail market as soon as possible, and let Intel have the el-cheapo marketshare down there. But that's kind of tough since AMD already dug itself into the profitless sub-$1000 mess.

So now that AMD has made the K6-III announcement, when can we start seeing the first CPU available on Pricewatch?

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext