1) I think he could have exposed himself.
The evidence, as I understand, agrees--no more. You think he exposed himself, let me confirm, is prejudgement creating judgement. Many others, against BC, do not understand that.
2) Again, adding another prejudgement on top of an existing prejudgement. To make a threat, which he only could have, requires that he have made a pass, which again, he only could have.
Personally, I think if he did make a pass, he forgot about her--so many trash-fish to fry as govenor. Yes, it is true, were the pass would be the threat would be the damages.
3) Aren't 1 & 2 what was tossed as an inadequate case? Doesn't 3 depend on 1 & 2?
3) Is it favoritism to do things off the job for ones you've come to care about on the job? |
