Nuinsco Resources (NWI) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Nuinsco Resources (NWI)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Tom Cat who wrote (989)	2/23/1999 5:50:00 PM
From: Terry J. Crebs	Read Replies (3) of 5821

Hi TC, << I see 99-1 in line with an Ind. Polarz. (IP) and within a mag anomaly, what am I missing here? >> Excellent question, use the plan map with the mag and IP anomalies to place anomaly bars on Section 11+00 N. Note that the IP anomaly as picked by Nuinsco extends to about 1+10W, while their mag anomaly extends to about 0+75W. Note #99-1 mineralization extends from about 1+10W to about 1+60W. Note that the IP/Mag anomaly bars DO NOT occur over the mineralization. Neither did the Input anomalies. This mineralization is very shallow, with borehole depth-to-top at less than 75 meters--if it had some tonnage, the geophysics should have nailed it. It apparently didn't. I repeat, be careful about what I think is geo-babble at Lac Rocher. Best Regards, Terry J. Crebs Lakewood, Colorado P.S. Heli-drilling to 150 meters (to scissor #99-1) is much cheaper than putting in any winter road--the "stall" reasons appear bogus to me. Drill confirm then build access roads.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next