SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Petz who wrote (50750)2/23/1999 6:52:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (2) of 1572145
 
<Anand's review showed the K6-3-450 beating the Pentium III-500 by 4% in Windows NT and running 3% slower in Windows 98. (Business Winstone 99). So, I don't know where you get your idea that thats "not so hot." Furthermore, Anand ran his benchmarks with 64M of RAM, which is a joke. Its obvious that the presence of L3 cache will be more significant on a system with more memory.>

Yeah, Business Winstone 99 is the only benchmark that the K6-3 450 (which doesn't exist yet) does well on. What about Highend Winstone 99? What about 3D games? How about some of those "gee-whiz" programs that the massive Pentium III marketing campaign is so intent on pushing?

I already admitted that the K6-3 will be AMD's first serious contender in the business market segment. It provides a real alternative to the Pentium II, while the Pentium II still lives, of course. But people who are considering buying a Pentium III aren't interested in mundane things like watching Microsoft Word zoom. And gamers aren't going to be impressed with the less-than-stellar gaming performance of the K6-3, unless of course, their only game is Quake 2 and their only 3D card is a Voodoo2.

The K6-3 has its place, but it's not a Pentium III killer by a longshot.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext