Hey Neocon. By no means did I say anything of the sort, and I hardly think Micheal believes women are valued only for their looks and how good they are in bed. The point he likely tried to make is that whereas men often judge one another on very simple, I think somewhat shallow, terms ("How big was that tiger you killed?"), women are more often judged on who they are and what they think ("What do you think about life, family, work, play, education, religion, racism, love, sex, happiness, the meaning of life? What are your dreams? How are your children? What do you think about parenting? What did you think of that book?").
I think Micheal is correct. I am not much into the 90's sensitive man thing - men crying all over the place to try and show how sensitive they are. Nevertheless, I would that men would generally become a bit more like women than men in the area upon which Michael has commented.
Michelle is grossly misrepresenting my views, and I find this unfortunate. She is hurting very much about something. I would like to help, but alas I find the divide too great.
(off to bed. Been a long day. Fairly productive. I think I will take tomorrow off and rest a bit.) |
