SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : WDC/Sandisk Corporation
WDC 158.11+0.2%9:55 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Rex Dwyer who wrote (4867)2/23/1999 10:51:00 PM
From: Binx Bolling  Read Replies (3) of 60323
 
FRAM? The March 8, 1999 issue of Forbes magazine has an article about
ferroelectric random access memory, or FRAM.

The article makes the following dubious claim on page 133:

"FRAMs by contrast, are as speedy as DRAMs, yet, like flash memory retain their data when the power is off. And FRAMs do it better. They can store data for years without consuming any electricity. Compared with flash and Eeproms, they can download data thousands of times faster, yet use one-tenth the power and run 100,000 times longer before wearing out. A FRAM could handle word-processing functions for years; flash memory would wear out almost immediately."

I think the author, Neil Weinberg, got used. By whom, I am not sure,
maybe, Celis Semiconductor, Symetrix, Matsushita, Mitsubishi, Hundai, Ramtron, or STMicroelectronics, all of which are touted in the article.

Or maybe, I missed something?

Maybe, Sandisk's PR people could write a letter to the editor?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext