Jonathan,
I really should not even bother answering your post, but here we go...
<What is new here? This is just a re-hash of what was in Time and in the Wall Street Journal.>
Nothing new, except that this is published in The New-York Times, which is quite a feat considering their bias.
<There is no evidence!>
There is a witness of Broaddricks crying in the room, with her face bruised, and her hoses ripped. What do you want ? A videotape, or a blue dress ?
<All they can do is advertise the story and exploit it fully, but where then could it go.>
"They" certainly won't advertise the story. You are talking about the NYT, but this story will help other victims with a solid case come forward.
< Do you think Clinton will resign or all of a sudden there will be this deep reaction in the American public going; oh, my we didn't
realize???>
I have no illusion about Clinton resigning, but his silence on this matter makes him look like the kind of man he really is, and one day, the American people will have to face the ugly fact that Clinton is a criminal. I have no idea when this will happen. But it will happen. If this happens before his term is over, he will have to resign.
<The media will run with this and then after it is exploited; it will just be repeat repeat repeat of the same story until it dies.>
This story will never die. It will go in history books, just like the other crimes of this rogue.
|
