>Unless of course you would like to apologize to ME and all of my associates for comparing us and our substantial contributions to your fortunes (if you have ever invested in technology) with every females ability to bear children.<
There is no comparison, Michelle. Women who work really are nothing but men. In other words, just as are men, these women are to me human assets used for production. I do not look to them and say “my, my, what a gal. She's a woe-mun!” No. If she produces I say “Good job! Now here's another challenge.” If she does not, I say “You're fired!” That's all, Michelle.
Contrary to this, to the woman who nurtures her home, I say “I honor you, madam. No doubt your children will call you blessed. And if your husband is not faithful to you and does not worship you, he then should be shot in the head at point-blank range.”
There is no comparison, Michelle. Women who work outside the home I judge strictly on the basis of the bottom line. That's all. Women who stay home to nurture their children I judge on the basis of so very many other glorious criteria.
Who is more valuable to society? Well society did just fine before women entered the workplace en mass. Men can do anything on the job that women can do. Philosophically there is nothing wrong with women working outside the home (though in many cases it presents practical difficulties), and so do not get it into your head that I want to send women back to the kitchen and bedroom. Nevertheless, the fact is we as a society do not need women careerists. Men have through the ages done just fine here. On the other hand, men have never generally been very good mothers, and nature assures us they never will. You can complete the logic from here.
(gotta go) |
