SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Brad Bolen who wrote (35418)2/24/1999 1:35:00 PM
From: Dan B.  Read Replies (1) of 67261
 
As stated, I believe the ruling used the term "may." I recall Democrat Mr. Schippers using that term in characterizing the Federal Appeals Court Ruling of last fall. I suspect this ruling and/or the expectation of it was quite significant to the achievement of the ultimate Jones settlement.

>>"IS" is a definitive term. "May" is not. A judge's ruling that it "MAY" have been
material does not equate to "IS Perjury"<<

I did NOT say it equated. As I stated, you "may" consider that lies under oath IS Perjury in this case. YOU may say the term "may" is not the definitive term- however,as for my post, I USED the term "may" and it IS definitive there-in, Thank-you. Hence, both you and the American people "may" make a determination that it IS perjury. The polls show 70% to 84% have made that choice by concluding Presient Clinton DID commit perjury. AND obstruction.

I suspect these polls are as they are because it's difficult- and may be counter to common sense- to imagine that he thought his withheld evidence wouldn't affect the case. That Jones received a settlement only after information concerning the hidden evidence came to light is also information that may be considered in determining whether you think the withheld evidence affected the case

It's unfortunate that you had to use the term "is" in your post, isn't it? VBG
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News