>...the rock against which the Radical right broke<
Do you make this crap up or do you get it off of restroom walls?
>A new fusion of ideas will come from the women's movement<
Like what? "How do we pull our heads out of our asses and explain why we just flushed 50 years of progress down the toilet with our inexplicable defense of a career womanizer and sexual predator"? or perhaps "As long as the acts committed, i.e. rape, sodomy, sexual assault, cigar abuse, are committed by a liberal then it's okay. Only when committed by someone who doesn't support our platforms can such acts be considered criminal".
>subjegation?<
Beats the hell out of me, but it seems like the perfect place to point out that since all of your arguments are based on an invalid premise, i.e. that
Clinton is anything other than a self serving, power hungry, sociopathic, slug, then you have no credibility either. So rant on all you want, break rocks against the Radical right or whatever, just don't think that you're convincing anybody of anything. |
