Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Bill Clinton Scandal - SANITY CHECK

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Kilgore Trout who wrote (36062)	2/26/1999 4:59:00 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (8) of 67261

Kilgore, I don't know - I definitely think her allegations are credible, but of course they are not provable, which means this is not grounds for impeachment in my book. I don't believe in judging by innuendo. Before this I think most would have said that Clinton is a womanizer only, and this changes things, but again it isn't provable so what can you do? The other problem we have here is that the right has embraced all kinds of stupid charges against Clinton, such as the entire Monica episode, and the public didn't buy that there was really any legal wrongdoing there. So there is this history of outrageous allegations by the right, and now we have this Broadderick thing which looks like it could be factual, except for the huge issue of the affidavit that she signed which negates everything. The public is tired and doesn't want to waste time and money on another perjury trap. So, we have a stalemate. Tell me, what would you propose on this matter? Surely you don't think this Broadderick case is grounds for impeachment do you?

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next