SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RDM who wrote (51140)2/26/1999 8:23:00 PM
From: Elmer  Read Replies (1) of 1572025
 
Re: "Since neither Yousef nor Elmer know the factual insulator thickness of the finished devices they cannot accurately judge the safety margins involved."

I don't attempt to. What I can do is ask some obvious questions. Why did AMD boost the Vcc now and not 2-3 months ago? Considering that AMD chose not to ship product running at 2.4V in the past, even though 2.4V would certainly have allowed higher speed binsplit, what prompted them to do so now? What changes have taken place in AMD's process that allow for 2.4V now when it was deemed too high a Vcc to ship reliable product to in the past? I find it difficult to believe that AMD as added thickness to their gateoxides to solve reliability concerns that toped them out at 2.2v in the past. In the absence of any other conceivable explanation, the obvious interpretation is that what was too risky yesterday when AMD was posting a profit, is now acceptable today while AMD is facing huge losses. I don't need to measure their gateoxides to see that their standards have been relaxed, and I've seen enough process changes to know that improvements lower Vcc's not the other way around. This is desperation any way you look at it, you're just polishing turds.

EP
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext