SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.53-1.1%Nov 14 9:30 AM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (74591)2/26/1999 8:28:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Cross-subsidization Absurdo! The source of the money to destroy competition doesn't matter. If Intel is a monopolist (and this is far from clear if the PC retail market is a market for chips)_, then it cannot preserve or attempt to preserve its monopoly by destroying competition how ever it is financed. There is no way that the entire x86 mpu is a single market. Since AMD has ceded servers to Intel by refusing to compete, the market share there (95%) is irrelevant in PC chip market. Since AMD claims to have big market share there and is selling at a loss, Intel's best defense is to charge AMD with attempting to monopolize the low end market by selling under cost. It is a perfectly good irrefutable defense. AMD has attempted to destroy Intel in that market and has promised to undersell Intel regardless of costs and profits. Sounds like a slam buck for Intel to me! (Market definition is all the game in antitrust).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext