SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: RDM who wrote (51140)2/27/1999 3:06:00 AM
From: Paul Engel  Read Replies (2) of 1571935
 
RDM - Re: "I believe that both Elmer and Yousef are making some kind of estimate without direct data. They a relying on a hunch"

Here's the real data.

Intel's 0.25 micron process uses a 40.8 Angstrom Thermally grown Silicon Dioxide gate thickness.

This process uses a Vcc from 1.6 volts up to 2 volts MAX.

Source: 1998 IEEE Soilds State Circuits Conference

AMD's 0.25 micron process uses a 35 Angstrom Thermally grown Silicon Dioxide Gate thickness - 12% THINNER than Intel's.

Source - 1999 IEEE Soild State Circuits Conference.

AMD is using a JACKED-UP 2.4 VOLTS Vcc across these gates, 20% HIGHER than the maximum Intel Vcc.

The net result is that the Electric Field across the AMD gates is 37% HIGHER than for the Intel Gates : (2.4/35)/(2.0/40) = 1.37

Paul
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext