SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : How high will Microsoft fly?
MSFT 476.93+0.6%3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: J Krnjeu who wrote (17012)2/27/1999 9:08:00 AM
From: t2  Read Replies (1) of 74651
 
Win98 code is an intellectual property subject to the protection of the copy right laws. If MSFT is forced to open up the code what is to stop a drug company from being forced to open up the formula to competitors. Basically, a drug company has a monopoly in that drug for years so it can pay for research and have a profit. I think an 'open code' ruling will have far reaching effects.

Mr. J Krnjeu, You made some good points. That is why the open code solution won't fly. I am betting MSFT will be winning this case as Windows is not a commodity that the company has, it is intellectual property. Why don't governments go after drug companies to force them to lower prices on monopoly products? They would state that drugs always face potential competitors eventually. However, MSFT only had the dominant O/S since early 90s. Therefore, it is too early to determine whether a successfull competitive product is around the corner. A 20 year monopoly might be a good case for the government but not this one.

That leads me to another point. Why don't drug companies face lawsuits in this area of overcharging customers? Who determines if there is overcharging?

BTW-I still believe that as the MSFT lawyers stated , the law is on their side.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext