SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Disk Drive Sector Discussion Forum
WDC 152.88-5.9%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: CPAMarty who wrote (5704)2/27/1999 2:17:00 PM
From: Henry W Singor  Read Replies (1) of 9256
 
Drive Prices.

Comparing drive prices between Oct 98 and now at one large distributer I found the following. On Oct 8 98 they advertised the Seagate ST34321A 4.3GB drive for $135. The same drive today sells for $135. In both cases this was the cheapest 4.3GB drive available.

The others are a little tricky to compare since older models have been replaced with newer higher capacity per platter drives. In Oct 98 a 4.3GB drive required 2 platters and 3 heads it sold for $135. Now with 2 platters and 3 heads a drive holds 6.4GB and sells for $149. So the price has actually gone up.

A 2 platter 4 head drive held 6.4GB and sold for $167 and up. Now a 2 platter 4 head drive holds 8.4GB and sells for $167 and up. EVEN.

In addition the 6.4GB drive that sold for $167 in October was a Seagate ST36531A. That same drive sells for $155 now. A 7% reduction over 4 months. Note that these companies are used to price declines of 10-15% every 3 months so in a relative sense these prices are actually going up. (Since Seagate is now shipping a replacement drive for the 36531A that has the same capacity with fewer heads and therefore costs less to produce.)

There isn't a lot of point in continuing since the majority of drives that ship will be the 3 head 6.4GB drives, (I learned that from the RDRT thread). For the small price difference I think I would go for the 8.4 but in a $999 machine I would suspect that the $18 difference would go into the PC manufacturers pocket and mean the difference between making a few dollars and losing a few dollars.

dirtcheapdrives.com

henry
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext