Hi everyone, I'm back!
There are a lot of things that need to be fixed in this society as I stated before, but right now I'm feeling sort of testy, so here I am, ready to get bitter and abusive again.
Hey Johnathan, you're new, huh? You're no Schuh, but that's probably a good thing.
Let's talk about the independent prosecutor, okay? I too believe that the statute shouldn't be renewed, but don't think for a minute that that will protect the sorry ass of the next Dem to egregiously violate the public trust, 'cuz it won't. All the statute does is provide a sort of pre-approved office, and getting rid of the statute won't get rid of the office, only the pre-approved status of the office.
It sure makes me laugh that the law created by the Dems in a feeble effort to get the Republicans came back around and bit them in the ass, and now all of a sudden it's a bad law. Kind of like the rules of evidence that allow questions about past sexual behavior in harassment suits. And harassment suits.
Once more, for the record:
Bill Clinton swore an oath to tell "the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth" and then he violated that oath. For this reason, he got his fat butt impeached. Whine all you want about out of control prosecutors, it doesn't change this simple fact. He lied, he got caught, he got punished. The fact that he wasn't removed is more of a reflection of lack of will and duplicity in the Senate than it is of anything vaguely resembling "innocence" on the part of the POTUS.
Try this for a new children's story:
"...and George Washington said 'I cannot tell a lie, there is no relationship between me and that Cherry tree.'"
-BLT |
