SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 34.32-1.2%Nov 18 3:59 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Scumbria who wrote (74734)2/28/1999 7:13:00 PM
From: nihil  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
Consider that when Intel is the first to sell a new design that they must sell it by the millions. They must freeze major design dimensions very early. They must "copy exact." There is no room whatever for initiative or creativity in the 2nd or 3rd fab turning out the chips. The second firm has a clear target to imitate. They are not bound to adopt details. They can bring in technology since the top dog design freeze. When AMD screwed up, it could steal a design from Intel (386) or could buy another company that can't compete and sell K-6's. It can't do that any more (no cash!). AMD may have a fast design study (with who knows how much hand surgery buried in the package), but you must sell them. Intel cannot promise anything it can't produce in volume. (phantom products).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext