"jmhollen has made some very positive and forward looking statements which are easy to attack."
< I am not attacking forward looking statements at all, I am simply reacting to offensive, incessant, unrealistic and overly emotion oriented statements that I hear coming from one individual.
The so called DD that I am hearing from that individual, other than what has already been clearly stated in press releases, seems to be nothing much more than fantasy, and loosely connected logic.
I believe this company has potential too, and that is why I continue to look at it, but not with the expectations being currently touted, or those by which this company became public with their $5.2 billion dollar dream "to be a dominant force in China and the Pacific Rim areas", that evaporated into thin air, (Dan Mendez, being present throughout the whole debacle of the time). >
"I am more interested in his "motives" than I am the negative comments..."
< I also am interested in motives, and that is why I finally began to try and rebut previous statements that seemed to be unwarranted hype.
My motivation on the other hand, has merely been to provide some kind of a cross reference for those out there who have not done their DD, or who are easily swayed by the unending "good ol' boys" type advertising promoted on this thread.
By now, probably 50% of my posts on this thread are aimed more at the hype, than the company, so I'll stop.>
< Chief, I respect your opinion, as I have read some of your statements on other threads, and they seem well based.
To all, as the vote seems to have been cast in favor of the jm. club, I will limit my future comments to "positive" news concerning lgov as I come across it. > |
