SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Silkroad
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: George T. Santamaria who wrote (245)3/1/1999 1:37:00 PM
From: ahhaha  Read Replies (1) of 626
 
The point I'm trying to make is that the wavelength extension has nothing to do with the physical dimension of the opto-electronics. It is like claiming that a radio telescope's diameter which is specifically designed to pick up say, 21 cm neutral Hydrogen broadcasts from the IGM is constrained somehow to 21 cm. This is not a nitpicking.

Whereas it is true that the size of the opto-electronics is irrelevant, the wavelength here is not the same as the wavelength found in classical solutions to the wave equation. That is a linear solution to Maxwell. Photons are non-linear solutions to extended Maxwell. The reason is that the frequency of the rotation of the E x B areal form determines the progression rate of the z directed helical motion constrained to Planck quantum units of the limiting velocity of light. This frequency is not the classical frequency, but it is this frequency that governs the packing density of the soliton-like photons.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News