It's obvious you didn't bother to check it out. It is also obvious you haven't researched much on Christian origins.
THE
BEGINNING
"All religions die of one disease, that of being found out." -
F.N. Morley
Doesn't it seem at least slightly suspicious that the New
Testament should be written at a time when Rome was at war
with the Jews? And that the public 'history' that we have from
the time is from the winning side. The Roman side!
This is the chronological account of not only how history was
re-written, but also why the New Testament was written, and by
whom, and how, and for what purpose. This tells the 'real'
history of biblical times between 19 C.E. and 192 C.E.
First, know that there was a hidden war going on, it is now in
progress, and it is the result of the conspiracy that was initiated
back in the first century C.E.
A partial list of the original conspirators include: Lucius A.
Seneca, Galba, Pliny the Younger, Lucius Calpernius Piso *
(Caesoninus), Arrius Calpernius Piso (A.K.A. 'Flavius Josephus'),
Vespasian, Titus (Vespasian's son), Justus Calpernius Piso
(A.K.A. 'Justin Martyr').
* The same name as the Lucius Piso whose daughter married
Julius Caesar - Lucius Calpernius Piso Caesoninus. That earlier
Lucius Piso was in fact, also a Caesar! He was Julius Caesar's
father's brother (That's right, his uncle!). And Lucia Calpernia
Piso was his first cousin. Marc Antony was Julius Caesar's 2nd
uncle.
Now, we will fill you in on some of the pertinent factors and
motives of the time. There were many battles fought between
the Romans and the Jews, on the field, and on paper - as
propaganda.
Why? Well, for one thing, the Roman aristocratic way of life was
at stake. It was one in which slavery played a major part. The
Roman way of life was one based on power and control; the
control of other people. The Jewish way of life was not tolerant
of slavery, because it went against the humanistic teachings of
Hillel the Pharisee. After the death of King Herod, the Herodian
Priests were losing control of the Jewish masses, because of
this new Pharisaic Party of Humanistic Jews.
Philippians 3:12 "Be all of you subject one to another, having
your conversion 'honest' among the Gentiles."
At first, they tried to give this new religion to the Jews (new
wine in old bottles), but when the Jews wouldn't accept it, they
went to give it to the Gentiles (new wine in new bottles), and
destroy the Jews. The proportion of Jews (Jewish Beth Hillel,
zealots/Pharisees), in the Roman empire by the late 50's C.E.
was over 20%. As humanistic Jews, they were a threat to the
Roman way of life, i.e., aristocratic. So, a few conspirators in the
hierarchy decided to give the Jews a new religion - Christianity.
They synthesized this new religion, and based it upon the
already existent Jewish religion, and using the Jewish books,
they customized it to fit the Roman way of life.
The New Testament books were written after the supposed
fact, so that it was easy for them to be self-fulfilling. The first
'Christian' book written was 'Ur Marcus', which was the
proto-type for the book 'Mark' that was written later by Arrius
Piso.
'Ur Marcus' was written by Lucius (Lucillius) Calpernius
Caesoninus Piso in about the year 60 C.E. (Perhaps closer to the
year 62 C.E.). Even theologians agree that chronologically 'Mark'
would come before 'Matthew'. The main conspirators at this
time included: Seneca, Galba, Lucius Piso, Gaius Piso, and
Seneca's nephew 'Lucan the Poet'. Arrius Piso was 28 years old
in 65 C.E.
The book 'Ur Marcus' was given to the Jews, who soon rejected
it. Of course, they maintained a company of their own private
slaves which they used as scribes to make copies of their books
to distribute to the masses, after which the slaves were killed.
This practice was copied after the Egyptian Pharaohs' practice
of killing the slaves who worked on the inner-chamber of the
Pyramids. For, these slaves also worked on the inner-circle of
the 'triangle' (the new trinity). Next, the book 'Ur Marcus' was
given to slaves and gentiles, who bought it hook, line, and
sinker.
This new group of followers were called 'Gentile Christians', or
non-Jewish Christians. In 66 C.E., Arrius Piso deliberately
provoked the Jewish revolt so that he could pave the way to
destroying the Temple because the Jews were not accepting his
Uncle's story 'Ur Marcus', which was intended to pacify the
Jews.
About the year 70, Lucius Piso wrote another book called 'Ur
Matthias' (the two books that went to the Logia, 'Ur Marcus' and
'Ur Matthias' were written by Lucius Piso). Lucius Piso died in
the year 73 C.E., that was when Arrius Piso inherited his works.
By the year 70, Arrius Piso and Titus' army had destroyed the
Temple in Jerusalem. Somewhere between the year 70 and 75,
Arrius Piso re-wrote his Uncle's books and gave his Uncle's
fictional messiah the name 'Jesus'. It was Arrius Piso who
thought to name the character 'Jesus', because it was Joseph
(Josephus) who was the father of the fictional Jesus in the
story. Now, when writing the books of the New Testament,
Arrius borrowed the characteristics for his characters from
earlier proto-types. The character for Jesus and even the
concept of the trinity, was borrowed from the already ancient
Egyptian equivalent of the Holy family. Osiris/Joseph - the father
who is a lesser god than the son; Isis/Mary - the virgin mother;
and their son Horus, who was the equivalent of Jesus ( they
even made a 'Horus-Caesar' as a joke in Egypt, Ref. 'The Nile',
Emil Ludwig, pg. 417 ). And, the Roman emperor Titus as
Pharaoh.
Also, some of the characteristics used to create the Jesus
character and some of the 'sayings' that they used, were
borrowed from Hillel the Pharisee. This was all too obvious to
the Jews, and especially to the Rabbis of the day, who for the
most part, were relatives (descendants) of Hillel (Beth Hillel).
These same were also relatives (distant?) of the Pisos, for they
also were descendants of King David.
Arrius Piso used 'Hercules' to contribute the following
attributes and characteristics to his Jesus character:
1. The 'Prince of Peace' title,2. The virgin mother,
3. a father who was a god,... and
4. he too was 'the only begotten son' of his 'god father'
(father, god),
5. Hercules too was called 'savior', and
6. had the title 'the good shepherd', and
7. Hercules also died and went for a brief visit to hell
(Hades), after which, he then ascended to Heaven (the
heavens).
By 75 C.E., Arrius Piso had revised the book 'Ur Marcus' and we
now know that book as the book 'Mark' of the New Testament.
Of course, with all of these things going on, and with new
conspirators on the rise, the conspirators didn't want to attract
any suspicion, but at the same time, they needed a system in
which they could not only keep track of their own material
(propaganda), but also keep their identities secret, yet still be
able to claim authorship - for both prosperity and their own egos.
2:2, The Epistles of Paul the Apostle to Seneca (Anneas Seneca, d. 65 C.E.);
|
