SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Microcap & Penny Stocks : Amazon Natural (AZNT)

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Dean Dumont who wrote (20588)3/2/1999 10:45:00 AM
From: Riley G  Read Replies (2) of 26163
 
Your story is changing again.
So which is it:
A. No agreement
B. Or the agreement that was terminated.
C. Finders fee that AZNT decided to just give you.
D. A breech of Contract for none PAYMENT.

Which TRUTH is it? First you claim no agreement, and then mention the one that was terminated, etc.

----------------
Message 8085778

To: Riley G (20421 )
From: Dean Dumont Monday, Mar 1 1999 8:53AM ET
Reply # of 20592

Riley,

Lets clarify this ONE LAST TIME, there was only ONE agreement between myself and AZNT and it was NOT an agreement to " Promote " the Market as Gary states. The callt hat Gary put together was an introduction to you. And frankly, if you recall it was also the last one. So, Mr. Riley, you need to GET your facts straight as well. As I can tell you are getting them from Gary, not real smart.
I hope the S.E.C comes to talk to me about AZNT, I have a few things about AZNT they'd love to hear, and see about Self transfer Sylver. So, in other words, show me an agreement between AZNT and Me. There ISN'T one. The one that did exsist was terminated due to breech of contract by AZNT, for failure to PAY. Riley, my boy, you may have just solved everything I have wanted to do in your email, phone call or via the ultimate brainwave...........thanks. Gary, go ask Mikey if he wants ME talking to the S.E.C., lolololololololololol

---------------
You are responding to this message from Dean Dumont on Mar 2 1999 10:25AM EST

Hey Riley my boy, that would be true if I were a broker. The other situation would also be true if the facts were to ever come out about AZNT. There was no agreement. The PROMOTER on AZNT is your old friend Bob Quiel. As for the " Work " I did for AZNT , well, as a shareholder I had an interest in the short squeeze that was going to happen in 4 weeks, LAST MARCH. I was not and never will be an employee of AZNT, there was no contract, what I did do for AZNT resulted int he company at its election paying me. Thusly they did in the form of a finders fee for introductions to the company of individuals that invested directly into the company via some type of offering that resulted in several hundred thousand dollars being raised. The company wasn't selling a lot of T.O.N so this money was used to pay for the accountants, lawyers (god knows they get the bulk of it) and phone bills, and shipping cost and a few other items I was not made privey to. Of those introductions several other individuals came forward with additional capital. Approx. $100-150,000 or more. PLUS, at the same time, these individuals that were talking to mike about buying stock a $0.25- $0.35 per share were investing into the open market to buy AZNT, thusly a second finders fee. Gary and you really need to start getting your facts together, what I did at the time was do just what I got suckered into doing, bring quality to AZNT, instead of the garbage they were dealing with at the time. Riley, you and Gary better be real cariful where you stick your fingers, you never know what'll happen or what you'll find......

-------------------

Agreements, no agreements, finders fee's...etc....
So just how was it that a breech of contract occurred if AZNT decided to give you shares out of the kindness of their heart for putting them in touch with funding.

Dean, you story flat out SMELLS of LIES and FRAUD! Just what was the real story once again... Was that "no agreement", or was it a "breech of contract" was again, or was it just a finders fee paid to you out of the goodness of their souls.

Riley G
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext