Iomega Thread without Iomega Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Non-Tech : Iomega Thread without Iomega

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: gil schmidt who wrote (7899)	3/3/1999 11:36:00 AM
From: Daniel L. Schuster	of 10072

I don't think the combo drive spanned the transition period at all. If memory serves me, the 3.5 started appearing about 1984 (or 85) as a separate drive. At that time the disks cost $4 or $5. I don't know remember what the drives cost, but I'll bet it was around $100 or more. The combo drives were rare and never popular to my knowledge. I suspect they weren't popular because the typical desktop had plenty of bays to put in another drive, they were expensive and reliability was 'iffy'. I believe the combo drive peaked around 91 or 92 when it was clear the transition was in progress. I believe the Zip drive is about where the 3.5 was around 88 or so...right on the edge of becoming the overwhelming choice as the replacement for the 3.5. I've been holding for 2 years and admit that I'm disappointed. If it isn't clear by a year from now that the Zip is the replacement, then I'll sell and take my lumps. If it is clear then I'll hold for profits. Dan Schuster

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next