SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC)
INTC 35.84+3.9%3:08 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dumbmoney who wrote (75200)3/3/1999 4:32:00 PM
From: Tenchusatsu  Read Replies (1) of 186894
 
<Uh, 'they' can do this NOW, since whatever software is used to retrieve the ID can be modified.>

But this requires more work. Setting the ID to some arbitrary value is far easier than hacking the software which retrieves the ID.

As of now, in my opinion, using the CPU ID in its current implementation for user verification isn't a very good form of security. Even Intel is admitting that this method isn't perfect. But things would get even worse if you were allowed to program the ID to any value that you want. The only sensible solution is to design a "This key will self-destruct in five seconds" switch so that the privacy concerned are properly addressed.

Tenchusatsu
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext