Party, if you were really an investor ...
Wouldn't they be playing with your money?
You said:
<<And these so-called "consultants" are not bad, are they? What company doesn't have consultants? .... I have no problem with the "consultants.">>
Why don't you have a problem with the two American-based consultants, one East Coast, one West Coast, who will receive $70,000 per MONTH for five YEARS, plus have ALL their office expenses covered (up to $186,000 per year) plus First Class air travel (between the two offices?) for five YEARS plus 750,000 shares at 50 cents a share, and all of this for work already done! Why don't you have a problem with it?
Do you think that $5Million of advice already received has paid off handsomely? The way the BFL matter was handled, for instance? Would that have been the Internet Consultants? No Party, you make no sense at all, down 3/8 from the little you once made ...
Only one of three reasons for your stance, that its o.k.for a little company like this to obligate itself at $1,000,000 a year for the next five years to ANYONE
(i) You have no investment
(ii) You are being paid even more by the companies to dispense this drivel
(iii) You are irrational
Your pick ...
I say it's simple proof that executive isn't running the company ... the hidden consultants are doing it for their own benefit ...
So why is there a value on the shares at all? By the way, what are ESVS shares trading at these days? |
